![]() ![]() Using DAE 8.0.3 requires that Pro Tools be installed before installing Digital Performer 7.1 or later if Pro Tools 8.0.3 is installed after Digital Performer 7.1 or later, the Digital Performer installer will need to be run again for DAE to function properly. Pro Tools 8.0.3 or later is not compatible.ĭP 7.1–7.22: Pro Tools 8.0 – 8.0.3 is required Pro Tools 8.0 cs3 or later is recommended. To use Digital Performer 7 under DAE mode:ĭP 7.0–7.02: Pro Tools 7.2 – 8.0.1 is required Pro Tools 7.4 or later is recommended. PowerPC G5 or Intel CPU, with multi-core processor or multiple processors INSTALLING DIGITAL PERFORMER If you are installing Digital Performer for the rst time, use the installer CD included in your Digital Performer package and follow the installation instructions in the Digital Performer Getting. PowerPC G4 CPU 1 GHz or faster (including PowerPC G5 CPUs and all Intel processor Macs)ĬD-ROM drive for installation and authorization Digital Performer 4.12 provides full compatibility and optimization for Mac OS X Version 10.3, code-named Panther. System requirements for Digital Performer 7 If it were me, even using a laptop, I'd prefer a laptop that would allow me to install 2 physical HDD's, over using an external.but if external was my only option, I'd install the entire rig and whatever else, into a single protective case to keep it all tidy.Quote What are the system requirements for Digital Performer 7? My main DAW has an SSD for my OS/Programs, but I use a standard 7200 RPM for my dedicated audio HDD. I'm not a single HDD proponent for my DAW machines, though many claim they use a single SSD drive in their DAW without issue. I'm not a big laptop fan with DAW's, but in the case of live recordings it makes more sense.or use a rack mounted computer, but that may be over-kill for what you need?Īlso as said about using a dongle-less DAW (such as Reaper mentioned), but then again for me, a Cubase user, I would probably just use Cubase Elements, and load the project into my main DAW with a full Cubase version. > To the OP, I side with what was said about using almost any computer these days should be good enough for what you describe, as long as the interface is up to the task, and plays well with your computer. As far as recording multiple tracks at once is concerned, again I'd think it would have more to do with the HDD's, and audio interface's interaction with the computer. in which I have 3 HDD's installed, each HDD dedicated respectively for OS/Programs, Audio, and Samples. I don't think I've ever recorded more than 30 audio tracks (a combination of mono & stereo), even on my older quad core Win XP with 4 GB installed ram PC's. Other aspects like the hard drive may make more of a difference. I don't believe lots of ram makes that much of a difference with just audio tracks.not unless you're running ram intensive things like VST's etc as well of course. Marc TrainorI'm thinking something else may have been going on there, just what it could be exactly is anyone's guess, it could be many om your BIOS configuration, optimizations for DAW, to the stability of the audio interface on a particular computer. I then turned on my performance meter on Cubase and it said I was running a normal rate or even a little lower the normal on the scale, so it looks to me, at least in my case, that the RAM maid all or most of the difference here. I was able to run the exact same test and it recorded for 10 minutes without a glitch until I turned it off. I then, just switched computers to my Dell workstation, which was also 7i and quad core, but which has 16Gb of RAM. ![]() I checked the amount of RAM in the computer and it was 8Gb of RAM. Soooooooooo, I then tried another drive instead of my Glyph Raid 0, but it still stopped about the same time. After about 3 minutes or so, it stopped recording and had a message that I was recording too many tracks at once, or something to that effect. ![]() I only had 3 mikes plugged in but I set all 8 tracks to record. I started out recording 8 tracks on Cubase 8.5 using my Focusrite 18i20 as an interface. I just had an interesting experience with RAM, I believe.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |